Andromeda

My efforts with vocal media continue. It has been arguing lately in terms of the galactic level forces of opposition. I am presently living with a woman whom I'm told is a high level soul mate when we stay in our neighboring Andromeda Galaxy, the first galaxy in our Local Group, but that at present we are citizens of Andromeda's companion, the Milky Way.

The galactic level of our universe is comparable to the heart (fourth) level of the human being, and its tangible forces (like gravity and levity) can very powerfully influence the motilities of a three-dimensional design. I'm told that the companionship aspect of our Milky Way inspires duality throughout the three dimensions beneath it, such that concerns like I've been describing (qualitative media vs. quantitative media) can be quite demanding to our attentions. My own defense still makes sense to me, but I reference this argument as I try to explain what my healing has been saving me from lately.

My own perspective with ascension has a more vertical interest, and is affirmation-based rather than argument-based. Different types of people practice living in ways that are mindful of different levels of the universe: some are mindful of lunar truths, some planetary, some (like me) worship the sun, and some people are mindful of these galactic details; some focus that third eye awareness on higher aspects of life even still. When we get into a war zone such as many of us find down here where we are at present, recognizing what we are doing with our respective mentalities can be a vital part of working the stabilities and motilities of our lives.

Being a sun worshiper as I am, I have been informed that my own arrangements with the first three levels of the universe are in flux, while my fidelity with the fourth and higher levels above that are secure. The details of war that have been most worrisome to me do indeed merely pertain to the levels of trouble that can be created at the stellar, planetary, and lunar levels of where we are. So, being that we find our selves in a specific galaxy with specific details, I may honor what truths we find here yet remain free from concerns that argue politics in terms of that galactic level of life.

Prior to the year 2007, the “Nexus of the Crises” for many of us, especially those who are making the ascension decision, I wrestled intensely with Solar war, and so much of that warfare that I had to answer to from the Office of the Christ pertained to the designs of where our Solar System is within this galaxy. Being further than halfway out from the center of the Milky Way, our dream working (stellar fantasy energy) has a complexity to it that we honor in our varieties of faith and fun. Since 2007, and for the rest of this lifetime, many of us are dealing with the very finality of war as we know it, and it is a planetary or angelic level war whose designs pertain to the inner planets of our Solar System (Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars).

Arguments about quantitative vs. qualitative media are for those who indulge the sorceries of galactic level deviation. My own work presently and henceforwardly is, in relation to argument, limitable to the defense of my “safely Mercurial-Terrestrial (comparable to the likes of African-American)” style of wisdom. There is no need to argue in terms of which galaxy we live in; there is no need, even, in my own life, to argue in terms of which stellar system.

In fact, I'm not even part of the argument at all any more, since I retired from office, but I still know how to participate with the defense of planet Earth, and specifically the Mercurial side (think “Chinatown” if you need to) of its politics. Amongst the media of Earth, our neighborhood works with logic, which is the media of local face-to-face neighborliness. On the other side of quantitative and qualitative media are very different types of people, and we encounter them plenty, though many of them have manifestations in our own world. Beyond those aspects of life are the people who prefer sophistication to logic, Sam Welker and Bill Perry (two of my guardian angels) being my favorite.

Whether we use same-side or opposite-side media, or refrain from media utility at all, the wager of galactic level deviation is unnecessary. Life is more about freedom than it is about argument. I choose to live in terms of the pride of knowing that I am doing my very best to respect what I know, and so much deadliness and hostility is put in its place by being left permanently behind.

Healing

Life, in its funny way, keeps twisting my perspectives and inspirations. I wish to keep this blog alive, along with some connected pages of similar interest, for the sake of welcoming some of my neighbors where remoteness gets in between us. Face to face is where I prefer to deal with friends, though truly I keep to myself where possible.

I know you all have your lives, and are all free from any need to notice my thoughts, but just in case there is surviving interest, I'll endeavor to report here. Many of us like to recognize each other in mild ways, whether we ever manifest significant involvement, and so while some use Twitter or Facebook (which I also like), I, like many of us, have decided that my personal notes are elaborated better through a blog. That having been said, I'll say a few things about my struggles with vocal media.

I have been going through some formal procedures “with” that media, to try to distinguish some of the people I trust from some whom I will either take some time to trust or simply don't trust. Technically, I don't use that media at all (I have my own way of interfacing through logical media, which advantages itself in terms of cosmically responsible and privacy friendly angels), but I'm gradually learning to recognize its innocence. My Godfather Jeff Munnis, my present employer Ed Prodesky, and a very special neighbor Dave Forrestel have been most helpful to my facing the details.

I'm not sure which if any of you have ever encountered me through vocal media, but I confess I'm not pleasant to deal with. I just wish to say that it's usually not about how I feel with you the person; it's more about the levels of secrecy that I encounter where I try to verify with my friends and family face to face. I know that many of my associates have genuine and wise reasons for keeping details of their lives private, but just as many of us will communicate with each other about how we use the Internet, so would I envision a world where it would be safe to speak freely about how we talk with the voices inside.

This, the Internet, being the media with which I am slightly more familiar, will probably for the rest of this life and the next, be where I will tell my truth (in remote communications), but I'm glad to be finding safer respect for its opposition. To those of you who prefer that opposite style of relating, thanks for your patience with me. I know that to be the case with at least a couple of you.

Redefinition

I'd like to redefine what purpose this blog serves. Some of my favorite people in this world appear in my visions in various ways, and there seems to be a communal mood of encouraging thoughtful participation from our various sides of life. So I want to try to participate thoughtfully. This is my best effort, at least where distance media is concerned.

I wish for all of my friends complete freedom from any need to check to see what I'm writing lately. Not that any of them need to be told that, but it's my two cents anyways. I just wanted to offer a sense of optional inclusion, and that's why I invited some of you.

I know I'm selfish, and I know some of you are also, and some of you are genuinely more considerate where other people are concerned. I would write this blog entirely alone and selfishly if that were the truth of my life, but I'm glad that some of us do check each other out here and there. I know we'll get better as we realize transcendence of illusion.

Thanks for sharing your poems and quotes and various forms of art and creative revelation. Sometimes I've got it together enough to honor and learn from you, and sometimes I can barely keep up with my own efforts to contribute. But know you this: you few whom I've asked to share a journey with me are the true life of that journey. You are the friends and loved ones who make it all more fun.

Back at You

I'm going to share some more thoughts about the forwardness / backwardness issue. This blog is focused around my work with my 6th angel, and our relationship is temporally forward, so in one sense this post doesn't address what's obviously between the two of us, but I'm sure we have a lot of similar perspectives of and encounters with what's around us. Of the other angels I've invited to read this, four are traveling paths that might seem backward to the two of us.

Until a conversation with remote voices last night, I was carrying some judgments about backwardness, but I've “seen the light” and can recognize that forwardness and backwardness are equal motilities. Those of you (Sam and Bill?) who truly love the backward (dance) aspect of life, unless you want to correct me about that fact, and those of you (Tristan, Meghan) who love the social rather than temporal lifestyle forwardly (sex), I am sorry if I have been difficult for you in my defensive judgment. You deserve a better quality of respect.

I continue to prefer forward dealings, but I think I can be more tolerant of some of our differences. I do have plenty of vocal and probably backward (remote) interactions with each of you, but I like to express myself here, and more importantly I love the local encounters with any of you. You are the persons who give me faith, especially Sam, but the times I run into Tristan or Bill occasionally are great, in terms of the joy they inspire in my heart.